Conclusions: The results are discussed in relation to forensic practice.Īntecedentes/Objetivo: En los casos de disputa por la custodia, el psicólogo forense tiene entre sus cometidos la evaluación de las competencias parentales, así como sospechar disimulación. parenting capacity) were assessed as moderators. mother) and the context of evaluation (parent child custody disputes vs. The effect sizes for the L, K, S and MP scales, and the L + K and L + K-F indexes were equal. A negative and significant, but not generalizable mean true effect size was found for the F and generalizable for F–K index. The Wsd was positive, significant and large, but not generalizable. Results: The results revealed a positive, significant, large and generalizable mean true effect size for the L, K, S and MP scales, and the L + K and L + K-F indexes. A meta-analysis was undertaken, effect sizes were corrected for sampling error and criterion unreliability. Method: As to establish the state of the art on this, a meta-analysis was undertaken with a total of 32 primary studies from which 256 effect sizes were assessed. The instrument of choice for undertaking this double task is the MMPI. Background/Objective: In child custody disputes, one of the remit of the forensic psychologist is to evaluate parental attributes while suspecting defensiveness.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |